When did the "S" become a Laser?
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 7:12 pm
- Car(s): Mk 1 GT V6 (SOLD)
Mk 1 Perana Replica Race Car (SOLD)
Mk 3 (1.3) building into 2.0 Zetec
Mk 3 2.0s
When did the "S" become a Laser?
Don't get on these forums much these days but I'm on the look out for a 2.0s Capri.
My knowledge is not brilliant on the model so I'm looking for info on when the model changed from "S" to "Laser" and what features distinguishes the "S" as I've come across a few lasers that have been re-badged as "S" models.
Love to pick the brain of an expert as my knowledge is mainly confined to the Mk1 Prefacelift Capris (from Australia) I'm living full time in the UK now so wanting to get into the UK spec Capris.
My knowledge is not brilliant on the model so I'm looking for info on when the model changed from "S" to "Laser" and what features distinguishes the "S" as I've come across a few lasers that have been re-badged as "S" models.
Love to pick the brain of an expert as my knowledge is mainly confined to the Mk1 Prefacelift Capris (from Australia) I'm living full time in the UK now so wanting to get into the UK spec Capris.
- Andrew 2.8i
- Donator
- Posts: 14783
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:38 pm
- Car(s): '83 2.8 Injection (sunny days only)
'04 Toyota MR2 (owned from new) - Location: Ceredigion
- Contact:
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Hi,
The Laser was introduced in June 1984, initially as a special edition and later as a regular model in the range. I imagine that dealers would still have been selling old stocks of S spec cars, so a car registered later than that may not necessarily be a Laser.
As far as I'm aware, there are quite a few differences between the two models. I'm sure somebody else will describe the differences in fine detail, but off the top of my head the S has single leaf springs, different seats and door cards, unpainted grille and headlight surrounds.
Andrew.
The Laser was introduced in June 1984, initially as a special edition and later as a regular model in the range. I imagine that dealers would still have been selling old stocks of S spec cars, so a car registered later than that may not necessarily be a Laser.
As far as I'm aware, there are quite a few differences between the two models. I'm sure somebody else will describe the differences in fine detail, but off the top of my head the S has single leaf springs, different seats and door cards, unpainted grille and headlight surrounds.
Andrew.
- Peter-S
- Donator
- Posts: 7456
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:57 am
- Car(s): 1985 Capri 2.0
1983 Capri 2.8i - Location: Kent
- Contact:
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
The S did not have the side rubbing strips either
- Andrew 2.8i
- Donator
- Posts: 14783
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:38 pm
- Car(s): '83 2.8 Injection (sunny days only)
'04 Toyota MR2 (owned from new) - Location: Ceredigion
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1865
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2015 5:21 pm
- Car(s): MK 3 3.0S needing restoration, 2.0S, 1.6 Laser (nearly ready), Skoda Octavia VRS, VW Polo 1.4CL
- Location: High Wycombe
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Both my 2.0S and my Laser are B-reg and both were surprisingly registered on the same day, 1/08/84. Neither were fitted with single leafs at the factory althoug my Laser now has them. Only the 2.8i has single leafs as standard.
The Laser is better equiped than the S by having a leather steering wheel and gearknob as standard and it also has the 2.8i front anti roll bar.
The S has the sports "Strobe" striped seats which are much more hard wearing than the Truro crap in the Laser.
The Laser is better equiped than the S by having a leather steering wheel and gearknob as standard and it also has the 2.8i front anti roll bar.
The S has the sports "Strobe" striped seats which are much more hard wearing than the Truro crap in the Laser.
- Andrew 2.8i
- Donator
- Posts: 14783
- Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 7:38 pm
- Car(s): '83 2.8 Injection (sunny days only)
'04 Toyota MR2 (owned from new) - Location: Ceredigion
- Contact:
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
My mistake!
Must try harder!
Andrew.
- pbar
- Posts: 7554
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:29 pm
- Car(s): Capri 2.0 Laser, frequent driver.
- Location: North-West
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Is there nothing mechanically different then with the two models does anyone know? Always thought the 'S', which is short for Sport? Meant that it has some sort of prowess. But maybe not then.
- D366Y
- Donator
- Posts: 2579
- Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:26 pm
- Car(s): 1986 Laser 1.6, daily runaround project
1981 GL Auto 2.0, Barn-Find-Resto, now also a runaround project
1980 3.0S, crash damage resto
1993 Fiesta 1.1
Currently full up and no more space but I still want a 2.8... - Location: Buckinghamshire
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
My understanding was that the engines were the same as the lasers, they just fluffed up the interior and made it look a bit different to sell a laser - much like a 2.8i versus a 2.8 'special' exactly the same apart from the interior, colour coding, and some wheels...
A wise man once said... "you can never have too many capris - buy another"
It's me, I'm the wise man.
It's me, I'm the wise man.
- Jasonmarie
- Donator
- Posts: 4717
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:30 am
- Car(s): Ford Capri 2.0 Laser Mercury Grey 1987 hobby .
Mercedes Vito tourer 2.1 Big Bus Daily Driver - Location: Kent
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
I might be wrong but I think ford swapped to the 205 block which gave them a 101bhp then a 99bhp on the S .
Ford Capri 2.0 Laser 1987 Mercury Grey .......
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
My A-reg 2.0S had single leaf springs from the factory.
I'm pretty sure they WERE a standard fit when they went to the 5-speed box, or around that same time.
AFAIK the 205 block wasn't used on any Capri was it? Or am I getting muddled with the unleaded head that is often associated with that block?
I'm pretty sure they WERE a standard fit when they went to the 5-speed box, or around that same time.
AFAIK the 205 block wasn't used on any Capri was it? Or am I getting muddled with the unleaded head that is often associated with that block?
- pbar
- Posts: 7554
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:29 pm
- Car(s): Capri 2.0 Laser, frequent driver.
- Location: North-West
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Thank you Danny, basically the same car with a different trim then pretty much.D366Y wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 9:43 am
My understanding was that the engines were the same as the lasers, they just fluffed up the interior and made it look a bit different to sell a laser - much like a 2.8i versus a 2.8 'special' exactly the same apart from the interior, colour coding, and some wheels...
- pbar
- Posts: 7554
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:29 pm
- Car(s): Capri 2.0 Laser, frequent driver.
- Location: North-West
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Thanks Martin. The 205 block was used on some Lasers I think? I couldn't say which ones/years, etc. though.Bug wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 10:21 am My A-reg 2.0S had single leaf springs from the factory.
I'm pretty sure they WERE a standard fit when they went to the 5-speed box, or around that same time.
AFAIK the 205 block wasn't used on any Capri was it? Or am I getting muddled with the unleaded head that is often associated with that block?
-
- Donator
- Posts: 894
- Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2017 3:54 pm
- Car(s): Just sold 1983 2.8 Injection 5 speed. Currently restoring another classic Previously owned 2 Capris. Likely to own another at some point
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
The presence of the side rubbing strips on the Laser seemed to pitch it as a better equipped version of the LS or the GL rather than a successor to the S.
When deciding to restrict the 4 cylinder Capri range to the Laser, Ford included a fairly high level of equipment to reduce the number of optional extras - it kept buyers happy but further simplified the build process as they were pretty much all the same. Buyer choices became pretty much restricted to engine size and the external colour only. This allowed better economies of scale on a car that was being wound down with lower sales expectations.
It would be interesting to find out if anyone at all at the time managed to persuade a Ford dealer to do a special order Laser at extra cost, maybe deleting the side rubbing strips or fitting the 2.8 interior etc.
When deciding to restrict the 4 cylinder Capri range to the Laser, Ford included a fairly high level of equipment to reduce the number of optional extras - it kept buyers happy but further simplified the build process as they were pretty much all the same. Buyer choices became pretty much restricted to engine size and the external colour only. This allowed better economies of scale on a car that was being wound down with lower sales expectations.
It would be interesting to find out if anyone at all at the time managed to persuade a Ford dealer to do a special order Laser at extra cost, maybe deleting the side rubbing strips or fitting the 2.8 interior etc.
Last edited by Not_Anumber on Thu Mar 05, 2020 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
As I said, I wasn't particularly confident on that bit.pbar wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 10:26 amThanks Martin. The 205 block was used on some Lasers I think? I couldn't say which ones/years, etc. though.Bug wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 10:21 am My A-reg 2.0S had single leaf springs from the factory.
I'm pretty sure they WERE a standard fit when they went to the 5-speed box, or around that same time.
AFAIK the 205 block wasn't used on any Capri was it? Or am I getting muddled with the unleaded head that is often associated with that block?
I do think though that the very last Lasers were built grabbing whatever was left on the shelf.
I have seen and owned versions on D-plates that had single or multi-leaf springs.
I have this image of the assembly line running into stores and grabbing whatever was left.
I think the biggest backward step on the Laser was the seats.
Threw out the lovely sports seats from the S and dumped in re-covered GL seats made of self-unravelling material. (Can you tell I'm not a fan??)
- Jasonmarie
- Donator
- Posts: 4717
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:30 am
- Car(s): Ford Capri 2.0 Laser Mercury Grey 1987 hobby .
Mercedes Vito tourer 2.1 Big Bus Daily Driver - Location: Kent
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Both my laser have the 205 block also both had Multi leaf springs one thing I only found out was twin horns as my old laser had a single horn but mine now has a duel horn .
Ford Capri 2.0 Laser 1987 Mercury Grey .......
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Yes, S's should have single leaves. My A-reg had them. But later on, parts bin etc...
Mine didnt have a 205 block.. but its the injection head with slightly bigger ports that give you a few more horses. Nothing to do with the block Im afraid, thats chinese whispers.
Also Im fairly sure only the injection engines had the wider, stronger conrods in the 205 block. So to confirm, just because its a 205 doesnt necessarily mean ypu have the stronger rods. Glyn could tell you more about that though.
I'm the one who leaves all those shoes in the carriageway.
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Oh and Ford never said S meant Sport... old Ford fans like us made that up later
I'm the one who leaves all those shoes in the carriageway.
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Oh (again, Im on my second pint of Old Perculiar up in the dales) I believe "proper" S's should have a 4-speed. The later ones had type 9s, in preparation for the Lasers.
I'm the one who leaves all those shoes in the carriageway.
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
I think Tom is perfectly correct in what he says about the 205 engine, in that the biggest gains were to be had swapping it for an injection one. I did that once for a mate. Fitted the engine, loom, ECU and 5 speed box from a Sierra, coupled to all the suspension, fuel tank, accumulator etc from a 2.8i. With a little bit of tweaking we had an easy 135bhp, through the original 3.44:1 diff. Went well.
The best bit about the 205 block is that it is thicker. Doesn't actually make it any better on it's own, as the original block was plenty strong enough. But it does mean you can give it a decent over-bore without weakening it and with less likelihood of hitting any water- or oil-ways.
The best bit about the 205 block is that it is thicker. Doesn't actually make it any better on it's own, as the original block was plenty strong enough. But it does mean you can give it a decent over-bore without weakening it and with less likelihood of hitting any water- or oil-ways.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 8:00 am
- Car(s): Rat - GONE
2.8 - GONE
Volvo - GONE
Only 2 Zetec SE Fezzas left now, 1.6 ghia gone. Mk 1 Focus replaces, sticking with 1.6 Zetec SE - Location: Hatfield Peverel Essex
Re: When did the "S" become a Laser?
Exactly the same engine spec as the Rat....injection Sierra with original 1.6 4 speed box and axle. Broke the 205 block racing a range rover, fitted a standard block under the injection head, didn't lose any power. As said, the 205 block was just easier to bore to 2.1. I wasn't aware any capris had it as standard but I stand corrected. AFAIK no capris had unleaded suitable heads as standard in any case.Bug wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 3:26 pm I think Tom is perfectly correct in what he says about the 205 engine, in that the biggest gains were to be had swapping it for an injection one. I did that once for a mate. Fitted the engine, loom, ECU and 5 speed box from a Sierra, coupled to all the suspension, fuel tank, accumulator etc from a 2.8i. With a little bit of tweaking we had an easy 135bhp, through the original 3.44:1 diff. Went well.
The best bit about the 205 block is that it is thicker. Doesn't actually make it any better on it's own, as the original block was plenty strong enough. But it does mean you can give it a decent over-bore without weakening it and with less likelihood of hitting any water- or oil-ways.