what is sexyer
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:22 am
- Car(s): (Had) mk3 1981 1.6 auto L green (have) mk3 1987 1.6 laser black
what is sexyer
What is sexyer a capri with the bumpers on or with the bumpers off???
Re: what is sexyer
Cameron Diaz?
-
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2013 9:23 pm
- Car(s): 1986 Ford Capri 2.0
- Location: North Wales Near Chester
Re: what is sexyer
I think they can look nice on certain cars with the side parts (plastic bits) of the bumper removed.
- pbar
- Posts: 7533
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:29 pm
- Car(s): Capri 2.0 Laser, frequent driver.
- Location: North-West
Re: what is sexyer
Bumpers on for me.
- gt-bloke
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 7:40 am
- Car(s): '85 2.0 Laser FR32 & 38 DGAS + Ford Weight Saving Kit (daily runner) - '77 1.6 GL (missus) - '69 2.0 GT XLR (project)
- Location: Isle of Man
- Contact:
Re: what is sexyer
Personal Pref, Mk-2 bumpers, de-stripped and satin black, but I'm biased..
-
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:16 pm
- Car(s): Black 1986 Ford Capri 1.6 Laser.
Imperial Red 1983 Ford Capri 2.0S (concors winner).
Silver 2002 Ford Mondeo 1.8 Zetec, daily driver. - Location: Birmingham, West Midlands
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:22 am
- Car(s): (Had) mk3 1981 1.6 auto L green (have) mk3 1987 1.6 laser black
Re: what is sexyer
This for me is hard coz I love the capri without the bumper on BUT I like the front bumper on and the back 1 off but you can't drive around with half your bumpers on coz u would look simple in the head!!!..................and as 4 cameron diaz no no no my friend megan fox
- rich_jc
- Donator
- Posts: 5091
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 5:27 pm
- Car(s): Signal Orange 1980 (W) 2.0 GL ("s" spec) 5 speed
- Location: Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk
- Contact:
Re: what is sexyer
On for me. Not sure about sexy though.
Rich
Rich
- Ghia15
- Donator
- Posts: 2585
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:14 pm
- Car(s): 1981 3.0 Ghia (Restoration Project), 1982 2.0's (Long term project), 1993 BMW E34 520i, 1999 Volvo V70 (Sold to the Parents)
- Location: Reading
Re: what is sexyer
Drove the 3.0 around for a while with only the front bumper and it looked quite good, looks better though with both of them on if I'm honest.
-
- Posts: 321
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 8:26 pm
- Car(s): 2.8i special nimbus grey
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:22 am
- Car(s): (Had) mk3 1981 1.6 auto L green (have) mk3 1987 1.6 laser black
Re: what is sexyer
I like that car
Re: what is sexyer
Bumpers on, side trim off.
Since I got a capri I've said "over the moon" a lot more than ever before.
-
- Donator
- Posts: 3856
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:20 am
- Car(s): Mk1 GLX
- Location: Manchester
- Contact:
Re: what is sexyer
ON! if you insist of them being off, fill the chassis holes and bumper iron holes in so it doesnt look like the bumpers are missing.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2013 1:22 am
- Car(s): (Had) mk3 1981 1.6 auto L green (have) mk3 1987 1.6 laser black
Re: what is sexyer
I agree with filling in the holes
-
- Posts: 1077
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 7:38 pm
- Car(s): Ford Capri V8 Twin turbo.
W reg black 3ltr S - Location: Melbourne Australia
Re: what is sexyer
Bumpers on!.
- pbar
- Posts: 7533
- Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 6:29 pm
- Car(s): Capri 2.0 Laser, frequent driver.
- Location: North-West
Re: what is sexyer
Yes, I think so too. Seeing the holes always makes you think that you must have them somewhere but not got around to putting them back on yet.Matty2148 wrote:ON! if you insist of them being off, fill the chassis holes and bumper iron holes in so it doesnt look like the bumpers are missing.
-
- Posts: 4412
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 1:17 pm
- Car(s): 1986 Ford Capri 2.0 Laser
2004 Mazda RX8 - Location: Surrey
- Contact:
Re: what is sexyer
Mk2 Bumpers of GTFO!
(debumpered ok if holes filled nicely)
(debumpered ok if holes filled nicely)
-
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 10:42 am
- Car(s): pontiac formula 400 (restoration project)
Re: what is sexyer
the wife of corse well mine are off at mo cos trying to paint it but both ways look good but on for me as there is to many boyracers around and i like my jeffa but no one seams to see or hear me lol and the blue 28 looks sweet nice car
- jimmyted
- Posts: 582
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 6:35 pm
- Car(s): ford capri 1.6L - now 2.0L
- Location: leeds
Re: what is sexyer
Too true. Best option by a country mile. Then followed by mk3 bumpers, then no bumpers at all.-JC- wrote:Mk2 Bumpers of GTFO!
I’ll go as far as to say the back de-bumpered looks decent enough, but the front looks odd. But you can’t have no bumpers on the back and bumpers on the front, that’s not right.
p.s side trim should burn in hell.